Obama: U.S. misjudged the rise of the Islamic State, ability of Iraqi army
By Foreign Correspondent
The
United States underestimated the Islamic State’s rise in Iraq and Syria,
President Obama said in an interview broadcast Sunday night in which he also
acknowledged the Iraqi army’s inability to successfully tackle the threat.
On CBS’s “60 Minutes,” correspondent Steve
Kroft referred to comments by James R. Clapper Jr., the director of national
intelligence, in which he said, “We overestimated the ability and the will of
our allies, the Iraqi army, to fight.”
“That’s true. That’s absolutely true,”
Obama said. “Jim Clapper has acknowledged that I think they underestimated what
had been taking place in Syria.”
Obama’s remarks were his frankest yet in
acknowledging that the rise of the Islamic State took the United States by
surprise.
The president, however, refused to accept
the premise that the exit of U.S. troops from Iraq was to blame, arguing that
Iraq “squandered” the opportunity to suppress extremism and build a lasting
democracy after U.S. troops left in 2011 “because the prime minister, Maliki,
was much more interested in consolidating his Shia base” than in national
unity. Obama instead blamed the ongoing turmoil in Syria for the rise of the
Islamic State.
“Essentially what happened with ISIL was
that you had al-Qaeda in Iraq, which was a vicious group, but our Marines were
able to quash with the help of Sunni tribes. They went back underground. But
over the past couple of years, during the chaos of the Syrian civil war, where
essentially you have huge swaths of the country that are completely ungoverned,
they were able to reconstitute themselves and take advantage of that chaos,” he
said. “And so this became ground zero for jihadists around the world.”
In the Middle East on Sunday, Islamic State
forces continued their attack on Kobane, Syria, pounding the strategic border
town with artillery shells, residents said, a day after U.S.-led airstrikes on
jihadist positions there.
The bombardment of the Syrian-Kurdish town on the Turkish borderstarted about noon, a spokesman for the Kurdish
fighting force there said. “They are using tank artillery and mortars,” Ojlan
Esso said. “There are many civilian casualties and damage to the city.”
On Saturday, U.S.-led coalition forces had
hit militants who had surrounded the city, destroying a building and two armed
vehicles at the Kobane border crossing, a U.S. military statement said. Esso
said that his fighters held their lines but that militants increased attacks
after the strikes, shelling the city center from
just a few miles away.
Elsewhere in Syria and Iraq, the coalition
continued to hit Islamic State targets over the weekend. The United States and
partner nations carried out raids on oil refineries in
Syria’s Raqqah province, the U.S. military’s Central Command said in a
statement Sunday. Raqqah is controlled entirely by the Islamic State, and its
provincial capital is the self-declared seat of the group’s Islamic
caliphate. Also Sunday, U.S. warplanes carried out three strikes near the Iraqi
city of Fallujah, where Iraqi troops are also battling entrenched Islamic State
militants.
It was unclear whether the coalition
airstrikes had aided Iraqi security forces in their fight in Amiriyah
al-Fallujah, 25 miles west of Baghdad.
On Sunday, the leader of al-Qaeda’s
affiliate in Syria, a group called Jabhat al-Nusra, released an audio message
addressing the recent U.S.-led airstrikes against rival Islamic State militants
in Syria. Some of those raids have targeted Jabhat al-Nusra positions,
destroying the group’s compounds and killing some of its fighters.
In the recording, Jabhat al-Nusra chief Abu
Mohammed al-Jolani warned the West and its regional allies that the cost of war
against jihadists in Syria would be high. He also said the U.S. and coalition
airstrikes were weakening the group in its fight against the Syrian regime of
Bashar al-Assad.
Jolani urged other Syrian rebel groups to
continue to fight Islamic State militants but to refrain from allying with the
United States and other Western nations. If those nations stop their
“aggression” toward Muslims in the region, Jolani said, he believes they “will
be safe” from attacks by jihadists.
Clapper, in an interview this month, said the United States has made
the same mistake in evaluating fighters from the Islamic State that it did in
Vietnam — underestimating the enemy’s will.
Asked whether the intelligence community
had succeeded in its goal of providing “anticipatory intelligence” about the
Islamic State, Clapper said his analysts had reported the group’s emergence and
its “prowess and capability,” as well as the “deficiencies” of the Iraqi
military. Then he offered a self-critique:
“What we didn’t do was predict the will to
fight. That’s always a problem. We didn’t do it in Vietnam. We underestimated
the Viet Cong and the North Vietnamese and overestimated the will of the South
Vietnamese. In this case, we underestimated ISIL and overestimated the fighting
capability of the Iraqi army. . . . I didn’t see the collapse of the Iraqi
security force in the north coming. I didn’t see that. It boils down to
predicting the will to fight, which is an imponderable.”
In late
August, senior U.S. intelligence and military officials — speaking on the
condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive operations — also said the United
States was constrained by persistent intelligence gaps in Syria and by an
inability to rely on fleets of armed drones that have served as the Obama
administration’s signature weapon against terrorist networks elsewhere, U.S.
officials said.
“Our intelligence is improving since we
began devoting the resources to doing that, but we still have only modest
visibility into what is going on in Syria,” said Rep. Adam B. Schiff
(D-Calif.), a member of the House Intelligence Committee.
U.S. spy agencies have expanded their
efforts to gather intelligence in Syria in recent months and are now flying
drones regularly into Syrian airspace. The CIA has also expanded its network of
informants in Syria, largely by recruiting and vetting rebel fighters who have
been trained and equipped at clandestine agency bases in Jordan over the past
two years, U.S. officials said.
But the CIA’s ability to operate inside
Syria was hampered severely by the decision to close the U.S. Embassy in
Damascus in February 2012, officials said. Unlike in Libya, where rebels
quickly seized control of the eastern half of the country, Syrian opposition
groups have been unable to control territory that could serve as a foothold for
CIA teams.
In the
interview that aired Sunday, Obama made clear the intentions of the campaign
against the Islamic State. “We just have to push them back, and shrink their
space, and go after their command and control, and their capacity, and their
weapons, and their fueling, and cut off their financing, and work to eliminate
the flow of foreign fighters,” he said.
The
president denied that the United States is fighting another war. “We are
assisting Iraq in a very real battle that’s taking place on their soil, with
their troops,” he said. “But we are providing air support, and it is in our
interest to do that.”
Obama said that it is important to
recognize that “part of our solution here is going to be military” but that he
hopes for a political settlement in the future.
“What we also have to do is, we have to
come up with political solutions in Iraq and Syria in particular, but in the
Middle East generally, that arise in an accommodation between Sunni and Shia
populations that right now are the biggest cause of conflict, not just in the Middle
East, but in the world,” he said.
Rebecca Collard and Suzan Haidamous in
Beirut, Erin Cunningham and Mustafa Salim in Baghdad, and Greg Jaffe and David
Ignatius in Washington contributed to this report. Clapper’s coments first
appeared in a column by Ignatius on Sep
Post a Comment